Over the years, I must have trained hundreds of schools and organisations on the use of symbols to support communication and early literacy. My approach hasn’t changed much, and focuses firmly on encouraging colleagues to think carefully about whom they are writing for and the words that they choose to use before considering which (if any) symbol might be the most appropriate.
A typical training session would start with a game. I give each colleague a sheet of paper and a ‘secret’ word. Their task is to draw a picture that will communicate the ‘secret’ word to the group. I choose the secret words carefully, some nouns which are easy to draw such as car, bus and banana, some verbs such as running, eating and sleeping, again relatively easy to depict in a drawing. I’ll also throw in some more difficult to depict words such as mother, which and yesterday. As you can imagine, it’s a lot of fun trying to decipher the drawings to guess the words. The purpose of the exercise of course is to encourage those taking part to really think about the word I have given them and what they might need to draw to communicate the meaning of that word to their colleagues.
Here’s a real life example from a recent training session. Have a look at the drawing above. Can you guess the word that it is trying to communicate?
The word I gave the colleague was ‘HISTORY‘
Did you work it out? No? Me neither.
The colleague who drew the picture explained that he found it incredibly difficult to come up with a picture that communicated the meaning of the word. “History”. He explained “history is about events that happened in the past and I couldn’t think of how to depict ‘the past’ in a way that my students who all have SLD / PMLD might be able to understand. So I drew a tree and man… ‘his tree’ get it? I put a bowler hat on the figure so you can tell it’s a man.”
This example illustrates quite nicely one of the difficulties we may encounter when we’re using symbols to add meaning to words. Quite simply, does the symbol we are using actually add meaning at all?
There are essentially three types of symbols.
- Symbols which we just know, pictures of things, for example car, tree, house, book.
- Symbols which can be worked out (decoded) for example big, jump, eat.
- Symbols depicting more abstract words which are difficult to work out and usually need to be taught, for example yesterday, went, going and of course history.
If we’re going to use symbols effectively, we need to consider the words we are using and who it is for. The next time you’re making symbol resources, take a moment to look at the symbol that’s popped up. Does it communicate the meaning of the word? If not, can you work it out? If the answer to both of these questions is no, you might want to reconsider the words you are using in your sentence or plan to teach your students what the symbol means. Remember, write for your audience and only choose symbols that add meaning. If you need to use more abstract words, be prepared to teach your students what the symbol actually means.
In the next part, we’ll look at some simple applications (PC and ipad) that we can use to teach symbol vocabulary.


Hi Ian,
Thanks for your great post. I love hearing about how other people talk about introducing & choosing symbols. I think your activity with your ‘his-tree’ man is a great example of how we can ‘map meaning’ onto anything. I guarantee that every person who reads your blog won’t be able to look at a man beside a tree the same way again. It’s so important for us to remember that with enough models and learning opportunities that we are the ones that have to power to make symbols have meaning for the people that we support.
Jess
Hi Jess
Thank you for your comments. You are absolutely correct that for many of our students it is we (as teachers / therapists) who provide the meaning to the symbols that we choose to use. We can’t rely on our students to decode them themselves.
Ian